|
Novus Biologicals
cd3ε Cd3ε, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/cd3ε/product/Novus Biologicals Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd3ε - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Novus Biologicals
anti cd3 Anti Cd3, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/anti cd3/product/Novus Biologicals Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti cd3 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Novus Biologicals
cd3 Cd3, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/cd3/product/Novus Biologicals Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd3 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Novus Biologicals
primary antibodies against cd3 ![]() Primary Antibodies Against Cd3, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/primary antibodies against cd3/product/Novus Biologicals Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
primary antibodies against cd3 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Novus Biologicals
cd3 novus nb600 1441 ![]() Cd3 Novus Nb600 1441, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/cd3 novus nb600 1441/product/Novus Biologicals Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd3 novus nb600 1441 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Novus Biologicals
nb600 1441 ![]() Nb600 1441, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/nb600 1441/product/Novus Biologicals Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nb600 1441 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: Multimodal Profiling of Repair-associated Immune Dynamics in a Mouse Model of Menstruation
doi: 10.64898/2026.02.06.704418
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Population restricted FC analysis to identify CD45 + Ly6G − NK1.1 − CD19 − CD3 + T cells in uterine tissue digests. (B) Bar plot, FC quantification: Relative abundance of T cells calculated as a percentage of total CD45 + cells per uterine horn. (C) Bar plot, FC quantification: Absolute counts of T cells per uterine horn. (D) Immunohistochemistry: detection of CD3 + T cells (black arrows) in uterine tissues 24- and 48 hr after progesterone withdrawal (representative images: 24 hr n=5, 48 hr n=6, scale bar= 50µm). (E) Population restricted FC analysis to identify CD45 + Ly6G − CD3 − CD19 − NK1.1 + NK cells in uterine tissue digests. (F) Bar plot, FC quantification: Relative abundance of NK cells calculated as a percentage of total CD45 + cells per uterine horn. (G) Bar plot, FC quantification: Absolute counts of NK cells per uterine horn. (H) Immunohistochemistry: detection of DBA-bound NK cells in uterine tissues 24- and 48 hr after progesterone withdrawal (representative images: 24 hr n=4, 48 hr n=4, scale bar= 50µm). (I) Population restricted FC analysis to identify CD45 + Ly6G − CD3 − NK1.1 − CD19 + B cells in uterine tissue digests (J) Bar plot, FC quantification: Relative abundance of B cells calculated as a percentage of total CD45 + cells per uterine horn. (K) Bar plot, FC quantification: Absolute counts of B cells per uterine horn. (L) Immunohistochemistry: detection of B220 + B cells (black arrows) in uterine tissues 24- and 48 hr after progesterone withdrawal (representative images: 24 hr n=4, 48 hr n=4, scale bar= 50µm). (FC analysis groups: control (n=15), 0 hr (prior to breakdown, n=17), 12 hr (tissue breakdown, n=22), 24 hr (tissue repair, n=16) and 48 hr (tissue remodelling, n=10) after progesterone withdrawal; statistical comparisons were made using Kruskal-Wallis tests with multiple comparisons. * p< 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001).
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Immunohistochemistry, Control
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: Multimodal Profiling of Repair-associated Immune Dynamics in a Mouse Model of Menstruation
doi: 10.64898/2026.02.06.704418
Figure Lengend Snippet: Immunohistochemistry: detection of (A) CD3+ T cells, (B) DBA-lectin+ NK cells and (C) B220+ B cells in uterine tissue sections at 0hr (prior to breakdown, n=4), 12hr (tissue breakdown, n=4-6), 24hr (tissue repair, n=4-5) and 48hr (tissue remodelling, n=4-6) hr after progesterone withdrawal (representative images, scale bar=500µm).
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Immunohistochemistry
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: Multimodal Profiling of Repair-associated Immune Dynamics in a Mouse Model of Menstruation
doi: 10.64898/2026.02.06.704418
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Population restricted FC analysis to identify CD45 + CD3 − CD19 − NK1.1 − CD11b + Ly6G − SiglecF − CD64 − Ly6C + MHCII − monocytes in uterine tissue digests. (B) Bar plot, FC quantification: Relative abundance of monocytes calculated as a percentage of total CD45 + cells per uterine horn. (C) Bar plot, FC quantification: Absolute counts of monocytes per uterine horn. (D) Population restricted FC analysis of CD45 + CD3 − CD19 − NK1.1 − CD11b + Ly6G − SiglecF − CD64 + Ly6C − F4/80 + MHCII + macrophages in uterine tissue digests. (E) Bar plot, FC quantification: Relative abundance of macrophages calculated as a percentage of total CD45 + cells per uterine horn. (F) Bar plot, FC quantification: Absolute counts of macrophages per uterine horn. (G) Population restricted FC analysis of CD45 + CD3 − CD19 − NK1.1 − CD11b + Ly6G + SiglecF − neutrophils in uterine tissue digests. (H) Bar plot, FC quantification: Relative abundance of neutrophils calculated as a percentage of total CD45 + cells per uterine horn. (I) Bar plot, FC quantification: Absolute counts of neutrophils per uterine horn. (FC analysis groups: control (n=15), 0 hr (prior to breakdown, n=17), 12 hr (tissue breakdown, n=22), 24 hr (tissue repair, n=16) and 48 hr (tissue remodelling, n=10) after progesterone withdrawal; statistical comparisons were made using Kruskal-Wallis tests with multiple comparisons. * p< 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001). (J-K) Immunohistochemical detection of CD14 + monocytes (cyan), CD64 + macrophages (yellow) and Ly6G + neutrophils (magenta) (merged and split channel) in uterine tissue cross sections at (J) 24 hr (repair, n=5) and (K) 48 hr (remodelling, n=3) following progesterone withdrawal (merged and split channel representative images, scale bar = 1000µm).
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Control, Immunohistochemical staining
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: Multimodal Profiling of Repair-associated Immune Dynamics in a Mouse Model of Menstruation
doi: 10.64898/2026.02.06.704418
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Population restricted FC analysis to identify CD45+ CD3- CD19- NK1.1- Ly6G- CD64- CD11c+ MHCII+ dendritic cells (DCs) in uterine tissue digests. (B) Bar plot, FC quantification: Relative abundance of DCs calculated as a percentage of total CD45+ cells per uterine horn. (C) Bar plot, FC quantification: Absolute counts of DCs per uterine horn. (D) Population restricted FC analysis to CD45+ CD3- CD19- NK1.1- CD11b+ Ly6G- SiglecF+ eosinophils in uterine tissue digests. (E) Bar plot, FC quantification: Relative abundance of eosinophils calculated as a percentage of total CD45+ cells per uterine horn. (F) Bar plot, FC quantification: Absolute counts of eosinophils per uterine horn. (FC analysis groups: control (n=15), 0hr (prior to breakdown, n=17), 12hr (tissue breakdown, n=22), 24hr (tissue repair, n=16) and 48hr (tissue remodelling, n=10) after progesterone withdrawal; statistical comparisons were made using Kruskal-Wallis tests with multiple comparisons. and * p< 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001).
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Control